| CRITERIA | RATING | DISTRIBUTION |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 1.0/5 |
|
| Planning | 1.0/5 |
|
| Costs | 1.0/5 |
|
| Willing to Refer | 1.0/5 |
|
| STARS | PERCENTAGE | DISTRIBUTION |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Stars | 40% |
|
| 4 Stars | 20% |
|
| 3 Stars | 0% |
|
| 2 Stars | 0% |
|
| 1 Star | 40% |
|
Company description: Not available
Contact the vendor and get feedback on your queries in a timely manner.
Contact the service provider and receive an appropriate offer in a timely manner.
This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.
Unfortunately, my experience has not been good. In a negative sense, I was impressed by how a small request for IMAP integration turned into such a big effort. It would be desirable if the communication channels, response times and handling with partners to resolve problems were faster and better. Our recent experience with the integration of our e-mail system and the recruiting system was unfortunately not satisfactory. We had hoped to experience a seamless transition and efficient communication, but there were several challenges.
We advise companies in the area of CRM development, as well as the expansion of any IT infrastructure. I myself work as a consultant in customer consulting.
Our recent experience with the integration of our email system and recruiting system was unfortunately not satisfactory. We had hoped to experience a seamless transition and efficient communication, but there were several challenges.
Our customer had the email inboxes running via relations GmbH, so it was inevitable to ask relations GmbH for support.
Communication: Communication was often unclear and delayed, which led to misunderstandings and delays in the project. Despite repeated attempts to gain a clear understanding of the steps required and propose constructive solutions, we often found ourselves in a situation where important information was missing or requests were ignored. Project management: Coordination between the parties involved was suboptimal. We had difficulties getting the necessary technical information in time, which led to further delays. Problem resolution: Ultimately, it was disappointing that a task that could be solved in a matter of minutes took several weeks to complete. This indicates significant shortcomings in process efficiency and management.
The managing director and 2 other employees. One left due to illness, which is why another contact person was brought in.
While we understand that technical integrations can be complex and sometimes lead to unforeseen challenges, the long lines of communication and lack of engagement from the service provider were particularly problematic in this case. We hope that this feedback will be used constructively to improve future processes and customer communication. In our collaboration with Mr. Mavridis and his team, we hope to reflect on this situation and take measures to avoid such problems in the future.
Very poor communication and willingness to solve problems quickly via meetings, which led to severe and unnecessary delays.
Unfortunately, my experience has not been good. In a negative sense, I was impressed by how a small request for IMAP integration becomes such a big effort.
It would be desirable if the communication channels, response times and processing with partners to resolve problems were faster and better.
This content of this review is only accessible to registered or logged-in users. Please register for free to gain full access to all content on our platform. After you register and log in, revisit this page to read the unlocked content. Additionally, once registered, you can fully browse our directories, gaining free access to all company profiles, structured favorites lists, and inspiring case studies.
Our recent experience with the integration of our email system and recruiting system was unfortunately not satisfactory. We had hoped to experience a seamless transition and efficient communication, but there were several challenges: Communication: communication was often unclear and delayed, leading to misunderstandings and delays in the project. Despite repeated attempts to gain a clear understanding of the steps required and propose constructive solutions, we often found ourselves in a situation where important information was missing or requests were ignored. Project management: Coordination between the parties involved was suboptimal. We had difficulties getting the necessary technical information in time, which led to further delays. Problem resolution: Ultimately, it was disappointing that a task that could be solved in a matter of minutes took several weeks to complete. This indicates significant shortcomings in process efficiency and management. While we understand that technical integrations can be complex and sometimes lead to unforeseen challenges, the long lines of communication and lack of engagement from the service provider were particularly problematic in this case. We hope that this feedback will be used constructively to improve future processes and customer communication. In our collaboration with Mr. Mavridis and his team, we hope to reflect on this situation and take measures to avoid such problems in the future.
The confident way of dealing with people meets well-founded experience from the industry and results in extraordinarily good results.
